Do Backlinks Still Matter for SEO in 2025? Real Data from 500K+ Monthly Readers
Do backlinks still matter for SEO in 2025? I tested this across 12+ websites with 500K monthly readers. Here is what the data actually shows about link building today.
Wasim Akram
July 24, 2026

Every few months someone publishes an article claiming that backlinks are dead. That content is king and links no longer matter. That Google has moved past links as a ranking signal. And every time, publishers panic and redirect their SEO budgets away from link building.
I understand why this debate keeps resurfacing. Google itself has sent mixed signals over the years. Some algorithm updates seemed to reward content quality over link quantity. The helpful content update specifically targeted sites with lots of links but thin content. And AI generated content has changed what it means to create valuable pages.
So I decided to stop guessing and start measuring. I analyzed backlink profiles and ranking positions across my own websites. I tracked what happened when I built links versus when I focused only on content. And I looked at correlation data from sites I have been running since 2018.
Here is what I found, based on real data, not theory.
What the Numbers Actually Show
I manage 12+ websites in different niches. Combined, they receive over 500,000 monthly readers. I have access to ranking data, backlink data, and traffic numbers going back several years for most of these sites.
The first thing I looked at was the correlation between backlink growth and traffic growth. On my most successful site, which focuses on government benefit eligibility, I tracked backlinks and organic traffic month by month over two years.
During months when I actively built high quality backlinks through guest posts and resource pages, organic traffic increased by an average of 18%. During months when I only published new content without any link building, traffic increased by an average of 7%.
That is a meaningful difference. But it is not the whole story.
The second thing I looked at was whether newer sites could rank without backlinks. I launched a test site in early 2024 and deliberately built zero backlinks for six months. I only published content. Good content. Comprehensive articles targeting long tail keywords.
The site did start getting traffic from Google. But it took four months to see any meaningful rankings, and the traffic plateaued at around 2,000 monthly visitors after six months. The keywords it ranked for were exclusively very low competition long tail phrases.
When I finally started building backlinks to this site in month seven, the traffic curve changed dramatically. Within three months, the site went from 2,000 to 8,000 monthly visitors. Existing content started ranking for higher competition keywords. New content ranked faster.
This matches what I have seen on every other site I manage. Backlinks are not the only factor, but they accelerate everything.
Not All Backlinks Are Equal Anymore
Here is where the conversation gets nuanced. The old SEO advice was simple: get more links. Quantity was king. Tools measured your success by the number of referring domains pointing to your site.
That approach barely works anymore. I have seen sites with 50,000 backlinks ranking below sites with 500 backlinks. The difference is always link quality and relevance.
Google has gotten much better at evaluating the context of a link. A link from a highly relevant, authoritative site in your niche is worth hundreds of links from random blogs or directory listings. I proved this on one of my sites by tracking which specific backlinks correlated with ranking improvements.
The backlinks that moved the needle the most were:
Links from niche-specific resource pages and roundups. When a finance blog linked to my eligibility calculator article in a list of useful tools, that single link improved rankings for the target keyword by four positions within two weeks.
Guest posts on authoritative sites in my niche. Not generic guest posts on any blog that accepts them. But well researched articles on sites that Google already trusts for topics related to my content.
Natural editorial links from content that genuinely found my resources useful. These are the hardest to get but the most valuable. When a university or government site links to your tool or article because it is genuinely helpful, Google treats that as a strong trust signal.
The links that did almost nothing were directory submissions, blog comment links, forum profile links, and any form of mass link building. I stopped doing all of these years ago and my sites are better off for it.
Content Quality vs Backlinks: The Real Relationship
The most misleading framing in SEO is the "content vs backlinks" debate. It is not one or the other. They work together in a specific way.
Great content without backlinks can rank for low competition keywords. This is how new sites start. You publish articles targeting long tail keywords, and over time, some of them start ranking and bringing in traffic.
Backlinks without great content is a waste of time. I tested this too. I pointed high quality backlinks to mediocre articles and saw almost no ranking improvement. The articles were too thin and did not provide enough value to justify ranking higher.
Great content with great backlinks is the combination that produces the best results. This is the pattern I see across all my successful sites. Publish genuinely helpful content, then build links to that content from relevant, authoritative sources.
The helpful content update from 2022 and subsequent updates did not kill backlinks. What they did was make it clear that links alone cannot prop up thin content. If your site has good content, backlinks still accelerate your growth significantly.
How I Build Backlinks in 2025
My link building approach has changed dramatically from 2018. Back then, I did a lot of outreach to random blogs asking for links. The response rate was maybe 3%, and most of the links I got were low quality.
Today, my link building strategy is focused and selective. I only pursue links that I believe will actually help my rankings. Here is my current process.
First, I create linkable assets. These are comprehensive resources, tools, or data driven articles that other sites naturally want to reference. My eligibility calculator is a perfect example. It is a genuinely useful tool that solves a real problem. I built it once, and it has accumulated hundreds of natural backlinks without any outreach.
Second, I do targeted outreach to specific sites that have already linked to similar content. I use Ahrefs to find sites linking to my competitors, then I reach out with a personalized email explaining why my content is better or more current. The response rate for this approach is around 15%, which is five times better than generic outreach.
Third, I contribute guest posts to authoritative publications in my niche. I only write guest posts for sites with real traffic and genuine editorial standards. These take more time to create but each one delivers measurable ranking improvements.
Fourth, I participate in expert roundups and HARO. When a journalist is looking for expert quotes on topics related to my niche, I respond with genuinely insightful commentary. This earns contextual links from high authority news sites.
I spend about four hours per week on link building across all my sites. That is far less than I spent in 2018, but the results are significantly better because every link I build is high quality and relevant.
What Google Has Actually Said About Links
Google representatives have made several statements about backlinks over the past few years. The most notable was when Gary Illyes mentioned at a conference that if you write great content, you do not need to worry about links. This statement was widely interpreted as "links do not matter anymore."
But that interpretation misses the context. What Illyes was describing was the ideal scenario for Google: great content naturally attracts links, so you do not need to actively build them. The statement was about the future vision of search, not current reality.
The Google Search Central documentation still lists backlinks as a ranking factor. The quality rater guidelines specifically mention evaluating the reputation of a website based on who links to it. And every major algorithm update I have analyzed over the past three years still shows a strong correlation between quality backlinks and ranking positions.
Google wants to move toward a world where links matter less. But we are not there yet. For now, backlinks remain one of the strongest ranking signals, especially for competitive keywords.
The Strategy That Works for New Sites
If you are starting a new website today, here is the link building strategy I recommend based on what has worked across my own sites.
For the first three months, focus entirely on content. Publish at least 15 to 20 comprehensive articles covering the core topics in your niche. This builds the foundation of content that backlinks will eventually point to.
Starting in month four, begin targeted link building. Focus on three to five high quality links per month rather than chasing dozens of low quality links. Use the approaches I described: creating linkable assets, targeted outreach, and guest posting.
Track your progress using Google Search Console and Ahrefs. Monitor which backlinks correlate with ranking improvements. Double down on the link building approaches that produce results for your specific niche.
Expect the process to take six to twelve months before you see significant results. SEO is a long game. The publishers who succeed are the ones who publish consistently, build quality links steadily, and resist the temptation to chase shortcuts.
Important note: Avoid buying links, participating in link exchanges, or using private blog networks. These tactics can provide short term ranking boosts but they risk Google penalties that can destroy your site's traffic overnight. I have seen it happen to competitors. The recovery process takes months and sometimes requires starting over with a new domain.
Conclusion
Backlinks still matter in 2025. The data from my own sites consistently shows that quality backlinks accelerate traffic growth and improve rankings for competitive keywords. But the nature of link building has changed. Quantity has been replaced by quality. Relevance matters more than ever. And links only work when they point to genuinely valuable content.
The publishers who are winning in 2025 are the ones who understand this relationship. They create exceptional content and then earn links through quality, not shortcuts. If you want to learn more about building sites that rank, read my guide on how to get Google AdSense approval on a new website which covers the content standards Google expects.
Tags